FR

Complex software doesn't have to feel complex.

Brand Appart helps SaaS founders reduce the interface complexity that drives churn, support tickets, and failed enterprise deals : through UX architecture, design systems, and dashboard design built for the user who never asked for this software.

Complex SaaS dashboard redesign

SaaS complexity is a UX problem before it's a churn problem.

Enterprise software gets complex fast. Features accumulate. User roles multiply. Edge cases get hardcoded into the UI. A product that was clear at 10 features becomes impenetrable at 50 : and the users who can't navigate the complexity don't cancel immediately. They stop engaging. Then they cancel.

The paradox of SaaS complexity: the features that make the product more powerful are often the same features that make it harder to use. The design challenge is creating an interface where power users access everything they need, and new users aren't overwhelmed by everything they don't.

Bricks
Gostan
Snowball
Very Mountain
Sowbeez
Qonnect
Reecall
Dermis
Voodoo
Notez-Nous

Interface complexity is an engineering problem
with a design solution.

This requires UX architecture : not more documentation, not better onboarding videos, not a longer free trial. It requires interface decisions about what to show, when to show it, and how to progressively reveal complexity as users build confidence in the product.

Brand Appart has solved this problem across B2B SaaS products, enterprise dashboards, and multi-role platforms : through research-first UX, systematic component design, and a process that treats interface complexity as an engineering problem with a design solution.

Reducing complexity without reducing capability

How we reduce interface complexity without reducing capability

UX Audit & Information Architecture Redesign

We start by mapping where the complexity actually lives : user research, task flow analysis, and heatmap review. Then we redesign the information architecture to match how users think, not how the database is structured.

Progressive Disclosure & Role-Based UX

Multi-role SaaS products need different interfaces for different users. We design role-based access UX, progressive feature disclosure, and complexity layering that gives power users full access and new users a clear entry point.

Design System as Complexity Reducer

Interface inconsistency is its own form of complexity : every time a pattern changes unexpectedly, users pay a cognitive tax. A coherent design system eliminates pattern inconsistency across the product.

Dashboard & Data Visualization Redesign

The dashboards that cause the most complexity are usually the ones trying to show everything at once. We redesign dashboards around the question "what decision does this user need to make?" : not "what data does the system have?"

Complex products
we've made navigable

Reecall

Information architecture overhaul for a B2B conversational AI platform : redesigned dashboard and navigation system that reduced cognitive load for enterprise operations teams with multiple user roles.

Mekaa

UX architecture for a B2B marketplace platform with two-sided complexity : buyer interface and seller interface designed with separate flows that share a coherent visual system.

Packmind

Dashboard and knowledge management interface redesign : complex engineering team workflows simplified through progressive disclosure and role-based UX.

View transcript
Amazing experience with Brand Appart! The team immediately understood my vision and turned it into a clear, modern, and impactful brand identity. Professional, responsive, and creative. I couldn’t recommend them more!

Trusted by
+40 founders

Notez-Nous chose Brand Appart to lead our rebranding project, including a full website and platform redesign. The boost in credibility has significantly improved our ability to close deals
David KatzCEO & Founder @Notez-Nous
We'd seen other agencies lock everything down two rounds of feedback, then pay more. With Brand Appart, the flexibility was real. That's why we chose them. The quality of the work speaks for itself. The rebranding landed exactly where we wanted it to, and the feedback we've gotten externally has been overwhelmingly positive. We're a demanding team, with moving targets and tight timelines. It still went well. That says a lot.
Sébastien TomiCO-Founder & CEO @Mysunbed
We knew Brand Appart's work before reaching out the creativity was obvious. And the final result delivered exactly that. The team adapted to how we work: fast, informal, no unnecessary calls. That made the whole collaboration genuinely smooth. What stood out most was the quality of the output. When we saw the new version, the whole team was back in love with the project. That kind of energy is hard to manufacture it just happened naturally. We're very happy with what was built.
Yoann RosCMO @Bricks
I’ve worked with Brand Appart on multiple projects website development, landing pages for branding, and PowerPoint presentations. I love how flexible, fast, and professional the team is. That speed and agility are exactly what we needed at Ircam Amplify.
Alexis BotayaManaging director @Sound Experience
We had a family brand that hadn't evolved since 2013. Handing it over to an external agency was a real leap of faith. What struck me most is that the team held their ground without ever steamrolling mine. I pushed back on certain directions early on. They stood firm, explained their choices, reassured me and looking back, they were right. Feedback is well received, adjustments are fast, and you can tell the team genuinely enjoys working on the project. That makes all the difference. We're now moving into a year-long collaboration.
Mathilde FerrariCo-Founder & CEO @Nomador

Frequently
asked questions

How do you measure whether a SaaS interface is "too complex"?

Several signals: support ticket volume on feature-specific issues, time-to-activation in onboarding (where it stalls), feature adoption rates across the user base (which features are used by >30% vs <5%), and qualitative user research on where confusion occurs. We run a structured UX audit before recommending a scope : we don't redesign everything by default.

Do you redesign the whole product or just specific areas?

Specific areas, unless the architecture is fundamentally broken. In most cases, 80% of the complexity problem is concentrated in 20% of the interface : onboarding, primary dashboard, and the 3–5 core user tasks. Targeted redesign of those areas produces faster ROI than a full product rearchitecture.

How do you avoid breaking existing user workflows when redesigning complex interfaces?

User research first, always. We interview existing power users before touching anything : because the workarounds they've developed often reveal what the interface is failing to do. We also run usability testing on redesigned flows before development handoff, specifically to identify cases where the new architecture breaks muscle memory.